Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok
HUN, Team Ch 2009/10 rounds 1-4, 2009 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Laszlo Dr Bencze (2251)
- Black
- Daniel Antok (2260)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- HUN, Team Ch 2009/10 rounds 1-4
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Laszlo Dr Bencze (2251) and Daniel Antok (2260) was played at HUN, Team Ch 2009/10 rounds 1-4 in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Laszlo Dr Bencze games or Daniel Antok games? This Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok?
Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Laszlo Dr Bencze vs Daniel Antok, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.