Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev
CT20/pr62, 2013 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gunars Beltins (1867)
- Black
- Ildar Munirovich Ganiev (2331)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CT20/pr62
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gunars Beltins (1867) and Ildar Munirovich Ganiev (2331) was played at CT20/pr62 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gunars Beltins games or Ildar Munirovich Ganiev games? This Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev?
Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Ildar Munirovich Ganiev.
What opening was played in Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gunars Beltins vs Ildar Munirovich Ganiev, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.