Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira
2011 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandre Belsley (1687)
- Black
- Maria Ines Oliveira (1828)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandre Belsley (1687) and Maria Ines Oliveira (1828) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandre Belsley games or Maria Ines Oliveira games? This Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira?
Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandre Belsley vs Maria Ines Oliveira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.