Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde
2010 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ubaldo Belistri (2079)
- Black
- Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde (2001)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ubaldo Belistri (2079) and Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde (2001) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (E25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ubaldo Belistri games or Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde games? This Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde?
Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde.
What opening was played in Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation (ECO E25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ubaldo Belistri vs Gaston Rodriguez Izarrualde, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.