Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas
2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Georgios Beliotis (1794)
- Black
- Hristoforos Nemtsas (1872)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Georgios Beliotis (1794) and Hristoforos Nemtsas (1872) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (B91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Georgios Beliotis games or Hristoforos Nemtsas games? This Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas?
Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Georgios Beliotis.
What opening was played in Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation (ECO B91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Georgios Beliotis vs Hristoforos Nemtsas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.