Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell
Whitsun GM 2014, 2014 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Simon Bekker-Jensen (2435)
- Black
- Stellan Brynell (2463)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Whitsun GM 2014
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Simon Bekker-Jensen (2435) and Stellan Brynell (2463) was played at Whitsun GM 2014 in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (E21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Simon Bekker-Jensen games or Stellan Brynell games? This Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell?
Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Stellan Brynell.
What opening was played in Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO E21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Simon Bekker-Jensen vs Stellan Brynell, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.