Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne
98. ch-ARG Semi-Final, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo Beherens (2067)
- Black
- Guillermo Lavergne (1481)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 98. ch-ARG Semi-Final
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Beherens (2067) and Guillermo Lavergne (1481) was played at 98. ch-ARG Semi-Final in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (D53). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Beherens games or Guillermo Lavergne games? This Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne?
Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Leonardo Beherens.
What opening was played in Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Lasker Defense (ECO D53).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Beherens vs Guillermo Lavergne, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.