Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea
2009 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Willen Beekhof Harmsen (1942)
- Black
- Tomas Ramos Orea (1715)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Willen Beekhof Harmsen (1942) and Tomas Ramos Orea (1715) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Willen Beekhof Harmsen games or Tomas Ramos Orea games? This Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea?
Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Willen Beekhof Harmsen.
What opening was played in Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Willen Beekhof Harmsen vs Tomas Ramos Orea, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.