Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais
2019 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin (1813)
- Black
- Rodrigo Romais (1637)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin (1813) and Rodrigo Romais (1637) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Exchange Variation (C01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin games or Rodrigo Romais games? This Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais?
Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais?
The game opened with the French Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO C01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Vinicius Buzzacaro Bedin vs Rodrigo Romais, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.