Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez
2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Miguel Fernando Bautista (1631)
- Black
- Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez (1860)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Miguel Fernando Bautista (1631) and Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez (1860) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Miguel Fernando Bautista games or Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez games? This Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez?
Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez.
What opening was played in Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Miguel Fernando Bautista vs Camilo Castellanos Rodriguez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.