Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues
2014 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matheus Peres Batista (1777)
- Black
- Jair Vicente Domingues (2004)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matheus Peres Batista (1777) and Jair Vicente Domingues (2004) was played in 2014 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matheus Peres Batista games or Jair Vicente Domingues games? This Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues?
Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues (2014) finished 0–1, a win for Jair Vicente Domingues.
What opening was played in Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matheus Peres Batista vs Jair Vicente Domingues, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.