Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau
Corr, 1995 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Sergio F Nicolau
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Corr
- Year
- 1995
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos and Sergio F Nicolau was played at Corr in 1995 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C19). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos games or Sergio F Nicolau games? This Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau?
Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau (1995) finished 0–1, a win for Sergio F Nicolau.
What opening was played in Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C19).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Rubio Leite Bastos vs Sergio F Nicolau, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.