Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo
2015 · Result ½–½ · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Suely Basto (1934)
- Black
- Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo (1717)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Suely Basto (1934) and Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo (1717) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Suely Basto games or Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo games? This Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo?
Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Suely Basto vs Antonella Victoria Romero Dongo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.