Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez
N2 ECH.NICOIS - VITROLLES, 2002 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edouard Bassard (1922)
- Black
- Dorothee Estevez (1758)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- N2 ECH.NICOIS - VITROLLES
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edouard Bassard (1922) and Dorothee Estevez (1758) was played at N2 ECH.NICOIS - VITROLLES in 2002 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (B52). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edouard Bassard games or Dorothee Estevez games? This Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez?
Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez (2002) finished 1–0, a win for Edouard Bassard.
What opening was played in Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Main Line (ECO B52).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edouard Bassard vs Dorothee Estevez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.