Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo
2011 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega (1690)
- Black
- Sebastian Toranzo (1835)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega (1690) and Sebastian Toranzo (1835) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (B50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega games or Sebastian Toranzo games? This Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo?
Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Sebastian Toranzo.
What opening was played in Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Modern Variations (ECO B50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Renzo Ricardo Bassan Noriega vs Sebastian Toranzo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.