Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato
WS/M/583, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Andreas Bartsch (2252)
- Black
- Carlos Almarza Mato (2151)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- WS/M/583
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Andreas Bartsch (2252) and Carlos Almarza Mato (2151) was played at WS/M/583 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (B67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Andreas Bartsch games or Carlos Almarza Mato games? This Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato?
Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Andreas Bartsch.
What opening was played in Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation (ECO B67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Andreas Bartsch vs Carlos Almarza Mato, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.