Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas
2010 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gintautas Barsciauskas (1875)
- Black
- Juozas Valauskas (1965)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gintautas Barsciauskas (1875) and Juozas Valauskas (1965) was played in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (D12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gintautas Barsciauskas games or Juozas Valauskas games? This Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas?
Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Gintautas Barsciauskas.
What opening was played in Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Schallopp Defense (ECO D12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gintautas Barsciauskas vs Juozas Valauskas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.