Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte
XXX Open, 2005 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Barrera Martinez (2096)
- Black
- Manuel Diaz Begonte (1862)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- XXX Open
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Barrera Martinez (2096) and Manuel Diaz Begonte (1862) was played at XXX Open in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Modern Line (D11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Barrera Martinez games or Manuel Diaz Begonte games? This Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Modern Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte?
Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Francisco Barrera Martinez.
What opening was played in Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Modern Line (ECO D11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Barrera Martinez vs Manuel Diaz Begonte, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.