Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz
2019 · Result 1–0 · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frank Barreiro Acosta (1692)
- Black
- Daniel Garces Munoz (1841)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frank Barreiro Acosta (1692) and Daniel Garces Munoz (1841) was played in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frank Barreiro Acosta games or Daniel Garces Munoz games? This Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz?
Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Frank Barreiro Acosta.
What opening was played in Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frank Barreiro Acosta vs Daniel Garces Munoz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.