Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga
2015 · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Barranco Mananet (1598)
- Black
- Carlos Sanchez Ruesga (1933)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Barranco Mananet (1598) and Carlos Sanchez Ruesga (1933) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (A87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Barranco Mananet games or Carlos Sanchez Ruesga games? This Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga?
Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation (ECO A87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Barranco Mananet vs Carlos Sanchez Ruesga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.