Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich
22. ch-EUR Indiv 2022, 2022 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alberto Barp (2394)
- Black
- David Gershkowich (2239)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 22. ch-EUR Indiv 2022
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alberto Barp (2394) and David Gershkowich (2239) was played at 22. ch-EUR Indiv 2022 in 2022 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (A88). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alberto Barp games or David Gershkowich games? This Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich?
Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich (2022) finished 1–0, a win for Alberto Barp.
What opening was played in Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation, Warsaw Variation (ECO A88).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alberto Barp vs David Gershkowich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.