Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos
2011 · Result 0–1 · French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Adam Attila Barocsi (2051)
- Black
- Menyhert Galambos (1906)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12)
About this chess game
This chess game between Adam Attila Barocsi (2051) and Menyhert Galambos (1906) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (C12). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Adam Attila Barocsi games or Menyhert Galambos games? This Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos?
Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Menyhert Galambos.
What opening was played in Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos?
The game opened with the French Defense: McCutcheon Variation, Duras Variation (ECO C12).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Adam Attila Barocsi vs Menyhert Galambos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.