Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli
WS/CCE/A/25, 2022 · Result ½–½ · Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (D47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Willem Barendswaard (2194)
- Black
- Marco Rotelli (2171)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WS/CCE/A/25
- Year
- 2022
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (D47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Willem Barendswaard (2194) and Marco Rotelli (2171) was played at WS/CCE/A/25 in 2022 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (D47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Willem Barendswaard games or Marco Rotelli games? This Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli?
Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli (2022) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense: Meran Variation, Lundin Variation (ECO D47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Willem Barendswaard vs Marco Rotelli, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.