Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos
2011 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Erick Silva Barbosa (1717)
- Black
- Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos (1872)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Erick Silva Barbosa (1717) and Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos (1872) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (B22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Erick Silva Barbosa games or Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos games? This Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos?
Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation (ECO B22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Erick Silva Barbosa vs Emanuel Valentin Dos Santos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.