Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes
CPV/C2010 (CPV), 2010 · Result 0–1 · Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antunio Barbosa (1830)
- Black
- Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes (1301)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CPV/C2010 (CPV)
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antunio Barbosa (1830) and Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes (1301) was played at CPV/C2010 (CPV) in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (C43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antunio Barbosa games or Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes games? This Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes?
Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes.
What opening was played in Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack (ECO C43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antunio Barbosa vs Daniel Marcos Sousa Lopes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.