Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve
33. Pobla De Lillet Open, 2024 · Result 0–1 · Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ricard Barbany Vellve (1902)
- Black
- Alex Bogerd Esteve (1886)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 33. Pobla De Lillet Open
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ricard Barbany Vellve (1902) and Alex Bogerd Esteve (1886) was played at 33. Pobla De Lillet Open in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (A03). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ricard Barbany Vellve games or Alex Bogerd Esteve games? This Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bird Opening: Dutch Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve?
Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Alex Bogerd Esteve.
What opening was played in Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve?
The game opened with the Bird Opening: Dutch Variation (ECO A03).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ricard Barbany Vellve vs Alex Bogerd Esteve, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.