Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes
VWC6/pr40, 2013 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zdenko Barbalic (1751)
- Black
- Dieter Kappes (1983)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- VWC6/pr40
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zdenko Barbalic (1751) and Dieter Kappes (1983) was played at VWC6/pr40 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (B85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zdenko Barbalic games or Dieter Kappes games? This Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes?
Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Dieter Kappes.
What opening was played in Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Main Line (ECO B85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zdenko Barbalic vs Dieter Kappes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.