Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson
Cheadle FIDE Open 1st, 2025 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sanjoy K Banerjee (1750)
- Black
- Edward Jackson (2153)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Cheadle FIDE Open 1st
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sanjoy K Banerjee (1750) and Edward Jackson (2153) was played at Cheadle FIDE Open 1st in 2025 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sanjoy K Banerjee games or Edward Jackson games? This Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson?
Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson (2025) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sanjoy K Banerjee vs Edward Jackson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.