David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz
Madrid ESP, City Ch 2010, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Bogo-Indian Defense (E11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Ballesteros Gonzalez (2227)
- Black
- Javier Moreno Ruiz (2459)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Madrid ESP, City Ch 2010
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Bogo-Indian Defense (E11)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Ballesteros Gonzalez (2227) and Javier Moreno Ruiz (2459) was played at Madrid ESP, City Ch 2010 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Bogo-Indian Defense (E11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Ballesteros Gonzalez games or Javier Moreno Ruiz games? This David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Bogo-Indian Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz?
David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Javier Moreno Ruiz.
What opening was played in David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz?
The game opened with the Bogo-Indian Defense (ECO E11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Ballesteros Gonzalez vs Javier Moreno Ruiz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.