Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos
2019 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas (1817)
- Black
- Fernando Bolanos (2231)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas (1817) and Fernando Bolanos (2231) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas games or Fernando Bolanos games? This Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos?
Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Ballesteros Cardenas vs Fernando Bolanos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.