Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen
NED, 1996 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rosanne Bakels
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- NED
- Year
- 1996
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rosanne Bakels and Margriet Van der Meulen was played at NED in 1996 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rosanne Bakels games or Margriet Van der Meulen games? This Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen?
Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen (1996) finished 0–1, a win for Margriet Van der Meulen.
What opening was played in Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rosanne Bakels vs Margriet Van der Meulen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.