Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny
25. Poznan Open 2017, 2017 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dawid Bajerlein (2037)
- Black
- Tomasz Mocny (1731)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 25. Poznan Open 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dawid Bajerlein (2037) and Tomasz Mocny (1731) was played at 25. Poznan Open 2017 in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (E34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dawid Bajerlein games or Tomasz Mocny games? This Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny?
Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Dawid Bajerlein.
What opening was played in Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation (ECO E34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dawid Bajerlein vs Tomasz Mocny, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.