Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante
Mercredi 2023.05.10 ABCD, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aurelien Bain-thouverez (1719)
- Black
- Michel Plante (2010)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Mercredi 2023.05.10 ABCD
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aurelien Bain-thouverez (1719) and Michel Plante (2010) was played at Mercredi 2023.05.10 ABCD in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (A96). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aurelien Bain-thouverez games or Michel Plante games? This Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante?
Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Aurelien Bain-thouverez.
What opening was played in Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation (ECO A96).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aurelien Bain-thouverez vs Michel Plante, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.