Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez
2012 · Result 1–0 · Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Santiago Bailo Remacha (2030)
- Black
- Andres Vera Gimenez (1986)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07)
About this chess game
This chess game between Santiago Bailo Remacha (2030) and Andres Vera Gimenez (1986) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (A07). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Santiago Bailo Remacha games or Andres Vera Gimenez games? This Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez?
Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Santiago Bailo Remacha.
What opening was played in Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez?
The game opened with the Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit (ECO A07).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Santiago Bailo Remacha vs Andres Vera Gimenez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.