Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab
2013 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jaspaul Bagri (2135)
- Black
- Assif Rab (2064)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jaspaul Bagri (2135) and Assif Rab (2064) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jaspaul Bagri games or Assif Rab games? This Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab?
Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jaspaul Bagri vs Assif Rab, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.