Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina
Al-Ain Classic Open A 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vahe Baghdasaryan (2395)
- Black
- Larisa Kalinina (2155)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Al-Ain Classic Open A 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vahe Baghdasaryan (2395) and Larisa Kalinina (2155) was played at Al-Ain Classic Open A 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (B60). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vahe Baghdasaryan games or Larisa Kalinina games? This Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina?
Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Vahe Baghdasaryan.
What opening was played in Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation (ECO B60).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vahe Baghdasaryan vs Larisa Kalinina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.