Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder
Brno CZE, 1998 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Madan Bagayatkar (1881)
- Black
- Jacques Van Gelder (1678)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Brno CZE
- Year
- 1998
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Madan Bagayatkar (1881) and Jacques Van Gelder (1678) was played at Brno CZE in 1998 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Madan Bagayatkar games or Jacques Van Gelder games? This Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder?
Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder (1998) finished 1–0, a win for Madan Bagayatkar.
What opening was played in Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Madan Bagayatkar vs Jacques Van Gelder, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.