Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura
2017 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Knights Variation (A46).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo (2012)
- Black
- Everaldo Matsuura (2462)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Knights Variation (A46)
About this chess game
This chess game between Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo (2012) and Everaldo Matsuura (2462) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Knights Variation (A46). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo games or Everaldo Matsuura games? This Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura?
Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Everaldo Matsuura.
What opening was played in Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Knights Variation (ECO A46).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Edmundo Roberto Ramos Azevedo vs Everaldo Matsuura, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.