Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich
10. Lichtenberger Sommer, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Steffen Axmann (1893)
- Black
- Tom Dittrich (1675)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 10. Lichtenberger Sommer
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92)
About this chess game
This chess game between Steffen Axmann (1893) and Tom Dittrich (1675) was played at 10. Lichtenberger Sommer in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (B92). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Steffen Axmann games or Tom Dittrich games? This Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich?
Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Steffen Axmann.
What opening was played in Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation (ECO B92).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Steffen Axmann vs Tom Dittrich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.