Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis
ch-LAT 2017, 2017 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maigonis Avotins (1972)
- Black
- Guntis Jankovskis (2266)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ch-LAT 2017
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maigonis Avotins (1972) and Guntis Jankovskis (2266) was played at ch-LAT 2017 in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (B43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maigonis Avotins games or Guntis Jankovskis games? This Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis?
Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Guntis Jankovskis.
What opening was played in Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation (ECO B43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maigonis Avotins vs Guntis Jankovskis, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.