Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll
EU/CT2021/ct 1 1, 2021 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Maigonis Avotins (1939)
- Black
- Pascual Cutillas Ripoll (1484)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- EU/CT2021/ct 1 1
- Year
- 2021
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Maigonis Avotins (1939) and Pascual Cutillas Ripoll (1484) was played at EU/CT2021/ct 1 1 in 2021 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (B90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Maigonis Avotins games or Pascual Cutillas Ripoll games? This Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll?
Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll (2021) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation (ECO B90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Maigonis Avotins vs Pascual Cutillas Ripoll, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.