Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian
2008 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tigran Avetisian (2027)
- Black
- Suren Hachatrian
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tigran Avetisian (2027) and Suren Hachatrian was played in 2008 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (D36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tigran Avetisian games or Suren Hachatrian games? This Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian?
Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian (2008) finished 0–1, a win for Suren Hachatrian.
What opening was played in Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Reshevsky Variation (ECO D36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tigran Avetisian vs Suren Hachatrian, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.