Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti
8. Gibtelecom Masters, 2010 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Joao Avalos Parra (2245)
- Black
- Bruno Zanetti (1978)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 8. Gibtelecom Masters
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Joao Avalos Parra (2245) and Bruno Zanetti (1978) was played at 8. Gibtelecom Masters in 2010 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Joao Avalos Parra games or Bruno Zanetti games? This Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti?
Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti (2010) finished 1–0, a win for Joao Avalos Parra.
What opening was played in Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Joao Avalos Parra vs Bruno Zanetti, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.