Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova
60. ch-BUL women, 2011 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Elitsa Atanasova (1743)
- Black
- Stefka Savova (2116)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- 60. ch-BUL women
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87)
About this chess game
This chess game between Elitsa Atanasova (1743) and Stefka Savova (2116) was played at 60. ch-BUL women in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (D87). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Elitsa Atanasova games or Stefka Savova games? This Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova?
Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation, Seville Variation (ECO D87).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Elitsa Atanasova vs Stefka Savova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.