Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe
corr-N Mkl, date unknown · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Olav Arvoll
- Black
- Terje Wibe (2390)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- corr-N Mkl
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Olav Arvoll and Terje Wibe (2390) was played at corr-N Mkl and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Olav Arvoll games or Terje Wibe games? This Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe?
Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe finished 0–1, a win for Terje Wibe.
What opening was played in Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Olav Arvoll vs Terje Wibe, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.