Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky
Chess Stars 4.0 Blitz, 2024 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vladislav Artemiev (2694)
- Black
- Evgeny Tomashevsky (2681)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Chess Stars 4.0 Blitz
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vladislav Artemiev (2694) and Evgeny Tomashevsky (2681) was played at Chess Stars 4.0 Blitz in 2024 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vladislav Artemiev games or Evgeny Tomashevsky games? This Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky?
Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky (2024) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vladislav Artemiev vs Evgeny Tomashevsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.