Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos
2009 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Gustavo Arranz Maurelle (1816)
- Black
- Juan Rubio Campos (1690)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Gustavo Arranz Maurelle (1816) and Juan Rubio Campos (1690) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (C34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Gustavo Arranz Maurelle games or Juan Rubio Campos games? This Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos?
Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: King's Knight's Gambit (ECO C34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Gustavo Arranz Maurelle vs Juan Rubio Campos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.