David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven
London Tolpuddle Open, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David M Armstrong (1825)
- Black
- Anthony Van de Ven
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- London Tolpuddle Open
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97)
About this chess game
This chess game between David M Armstrong (1825) and Anthony Van de Ven was played at London Tolpuddle Open and finished ½–½. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (A97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David M Armstrong games or Anthony Van de Ven games? This David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven?
David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, Ilyin-Zhenevsky Variation (ECO A97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David M Armstrong vs Anthony Van de Ven, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.