Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab
2013 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Saber Majeed Ares (2121)
- Black
- Hashim Hattab (1987)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Saber Majeed Ares (2121) and Hashim Hattab (1987) was played in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Saber Majeed Ares games or Hashim Hattab games? This Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab?
Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Saber Majeed Ares.
What opening was played in Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Saber Majeed Ares vs Hashim Hattab, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.