Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela
6. Marcel Duchamp Cup, 2023 · Result 1–0 · Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jairo Araque (1961)
- Black
- Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela (1508)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 6. Marcel Duchamp Cup
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jairo Araque (1961) and Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela (1508) was played at 6. Marcel Duchamp Cup in 2023 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (A82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jairo Araque games or Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela games? This Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela?
Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela (2023) finished 1–0, a win for Jairo Araque.
What opening was played in Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela?
The game opened with the Dutch Defense: Staunton Gambit (ECO A82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jairo Araque vs Federico Gonzalez Valenzuela, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.